Third reply from Martin Chalfie

28. November 2011

1 Comment



Dear Greg,

Your comment about being a lab monk got me thinking about Neal Stephenson’s book Anathem, which describes an alternative Earth where scientists — not members of a religious order — live a cloistered life away from the demands of the outside world. In the end that cloistered world br[......]

继续阅读

Continue reading...

Third letter to Martin Chalfie

3. November 2011

2 Comments



Dear Marty,

It is heartening to hear that you think I will do fine in selecting a good problem to work on, since I obviously have my doubts. We have been discussing the choice of a research topic in some detail, but we have not yet touched upon the actual day-to-day practice of science. Scientist[......]

继续阅读

Continue reading...

Second reply from Martin Chalfie

10. October 2011

2 Comments



Dear Greg,

I like your distinction between justification and motivation and your desire to include wanting to improve the world as one of your motivations. Talking about motivation, however, is tricky, since people have so many reasons, some acknowledged and some not, for doing what they do. And[......]

继续阅读

Continue reading...

Second letter to Martin Chalfie

28. September 2011

1 Comment



Dear Marty,

Thank you very much for your kind reply. From a practical point of view, i.e., regarding what kind of research I plan on doing, I concur with your advice. I share your wariness of translational research and the unrealistic expectation of immediate outcomes from basic science.

But s[......]

继续阅读

Continue reading...

Reply to Greg from Martin Chalfie

9. September 2011

2 Comments



Dear Greg,

Your concern about the applicability of your research is important, but I feel that the pressures on all researchers (especially new researchers) may be different now than when I began my research career.  Many of my ideas about research were formed while interacting with colleagues du[......]

继续阅读

Continue reading...
1 2   Next »